Is buying a house, a good or bad idea?

Is homeownership a smart move or a misstep?

Growing up, my parents instilled in me the belief that homeownership always triumphs over renting. A house appreciates in value, while rent simply vanishes into the landlord’s pocket. Now, as I approach the phase in life where buying a home is feasible, I find myself pondering – is this the right step? With a rental, any issue is swiftly resolved by a quick call to the building manager, often without me lifting a finger. Yes, the rent sees a slight increase each year, but the flexibility it offers is undeniable. The only significant cost of moving is the movers themselves.

In contrast, my homeowning friends share tales of intense negotiations with mortgage lenders and banks. After moving in, there are additional expenses: drapes, carpets, insurance, security and gardening equipment, and a myriad of other unexpected costs. They console themselves with the notion that their home will appreciate, serving as their retirement nest egg. When I voice concerns about potential issues like increasing mortgage rates, roof leaks, or window replacements, they speak of home equity lines of credit. But isn’t that just dipping into their retirement savings prematurely? The idea of reliving my college days with a diet of ketchup soup and instant mac and cheese is far from appealing. I value my financial freedom.

So, what’s my strategy? Retirement is inevitable, and I know I’ll need funds for it. I won’t overstretch by buying the largest house within my budget, risking the shackles of overwhelming debt if circumstances turn unfavorable. My approach involves a modest house (hopefully not too far into the suburbs) or a city-based condo to reduce commuting time and costs. This balanced approach should preserve my peace of mind.

But if romance and family enter the picture – well, that’s a game changer. Then all plans might need reconsideration.

Contact Rumanek & Company. for more information on bankruptcy and debt solutions. Or please fill out the free bankruptcy evaluation form. To learn more please visit our YouTube Channel. Rumanek & Company have been helping individuals and families overcome debt for more than 25 years.

What Happens if I Die During Bankruptcy

<img class="size-medium wp-image-6537 alignright" src="https://www.rumanek.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/retirement-300×200.jpg" alt="Retired couple discussing their financial budget at home" width="300" height="200" srcset="https://www.rumanek.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/retirement-300×200.jpg 300w, https://www.rumanek.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/retirement-150×100 januvia cost.jpg 150w, https://www.rumanek.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/retirement-1024×682.jpg 1024w” sizes=”(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px” />

What happens if I die or my spouse dies during Bankruptcy?

The short answer to what will happen if you die during bankruptcy is that nothing will happen to you. Your spouse filed a Consumer Proposal to settle his obligations to his creditors. Upon your spouse’s death, the surviving spouse has no obligation to continue making the monthly payment on the proposal, although, the surviving spouse may voluntarily agree to do so. In the majority of cases, the surviving spouse will decide not to continue to make the monthly payments and simply allows the Consumer Proposal to go into default. The proposal will be annulled once the proposal falls 3 payments in arrears. The only obligation of the surviving spouse is for joint debts. The liability for joint debts should be discussed with your trustee at the time the original papers are signed to start the Consumer Proposal.

Upon the death of your spouse, please forward a copy of the death certificate that you receive from the funeral home to your trustee, who is acting in the capacity of the Administrator of the Proposal.

Contact Rumanek & Company Ltd. for more information on bankruptcy and debt solutions. Or please fill out the free bankruptcy evaluation form. To learn more please visit our YouTube Channel. Rumanek & Company have been helping individuals and families overcome debt for more than 25 years.

What are the disadvantages of hiring a debt settlement firm?

BankruptcyWhat are the disadvantages of hiring a debt settlement firm?

Anyone searching for debt relief options on the internet will likely see ads for firms offering debt settlement services to Ontario residents. These firms might be traditional debt settlement firms—which are supposed to hold the necessary license issued by the Ontario

Government—or they might be a firm exempt from this requirement. This latter group includes law firms, credit counselling agencies, and bankruptcy trustees. Debt settlement involves an informal agreement between a creditor and a consumer under which the creditor agrees to accept a one-time lump sum payment for less than one hundred percent of the outstanding balance as settlement in full. This is an alternative to a consumer proposal which is only available through a bankruptcy trustee.

No creditor will agree to an informal proposal unless your account is a minimum of six months overdue. In contrast, there is no such requirement for making a consumer proposal. Compared with a consumer proposal, debt settlement—or an informal proposal—has a number of disadvantages.

  1. You will receive collection calls
  2. You might be sued
  3. Results are not guaranteed
  4. It may be expensive

If you are an Ontario resident and you hire a traditional debt settlement firm then the fee they can charge you for settling a particular account is capped at ten percent of the amount of the debt on the date you signed a debt settlement agreement. If, however, you hire a law firm, you might pay substantially more in fees.

Contact Rumanek & Company Ltd. for more information on bankruptcy and debt solutions. Or please fill out the free bankruptcy evaluation form. To learn more please visit our YouTube Channel. Rumanek & Company have been helping individuals and families overcome debt for more than 25 years.

How can I avoid paying a debt due to the passage of time?

bankruptcyHow can I avoid paying a debt due to the passage of time?

In Ontario, where a consumer has an unsecured consumer debt, the creditor must sue the consumer within two years of the date of last payment, otherwise the creditor might find it very difficult, if not impossible, to recover any monies from the consumer. An Ontario resident can only take advantage of Ontario’s two year statute of limitations to avoid paying a debt to a creditor on unsecured consumer debts. This protection is not available for the following types of debts:

  • Secured debt
  • Monies owing to the government
  • Spousal support and child support obligations

The clock on Ontario’s two-year statute of limitations begins to run on the date of last payment. A consumer can restart the clock during this two-year window by either making a partial payment or making a written acknowledgement of the debt. On the date that the two-year statute of limitations expires the consumer’s financial obligation does not magically disappear. The expiry of the two-year limitation period, however, does provide the consumer with an affirmative defence in the event that the creditor were to sue the consumer.

If a creditor were to sue a consumer after the expiry of Ontario’s two-year statute of limitations the consumer simply has to file a defence pleading the expiry of Ontario’s two-year limitation period and the creditor would lose its lawsuit. Creditors rarely sue consumers on unsecured consumer accounts more than two years after the date of last payment.

Contact Rumanek & Company Ltd.  for more information on bankruptcy and debt solutions. Or please fill out the <a href="https://www.rumanek their explanation.com/contact/free-evaluation-form/”>free bankruptcy evaluation form. To learn more please visit our YouTube Channel. Rumanek & Company have been helping individuals and families overcome debt for more than 25 years.